You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Intellectual Crisis of a Good Idea
Max L. Stackhouse
The Journal of Religious Ethics
Vol. 26, No. 2 (Fall, 1998), pp. 263-268
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40008659
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Human rights, Theology, Religious equality, Islam, Faith, Christianity, Secularization, Evil, Religious ethics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Against those who hold that human rights find an adequate grounding in secular conceptions of human dignity, the author argues that the foundations of human rights claims are essentially theological. Against those who represent religion as the opponent of human rights, the author argues that though some religious communities have violated human rights, these violations can be seen as the culpable failures of sinful cultures and pagan or secular forces as much as the expressions of a critically held faith. Reason converges with some religious orientations to form theology, and theology provides the key resources by which we can judge the bad faith of religious communities and provide the moral architecture for civilization--including the convictions expressed in human rights discourse.
The Journal of Religious Ethics © 1998 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc