You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attitudes toward Child Abuse Preventions
Melinda F. Davis, William N. Marshall Jr. and Ellen Price
Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science
Vol. 34, No. 2 (2002), pp. 112-119
Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022783
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Attitudes towards contemporary strategies to prevent child abuse and neglect were surveyed among a convenience sample of 191 health care workers and 38 others attending conferences about child maltreatment. These strategies included services to parents (home visits, drop-in day care, increased welfare payments, mental health), served to children (education about child abuse, mental health), services for child welfare professionals (education, increased staffing), and increased legal avenues (stricter laws, increased avenues for child custody, mandatory child protective services [CPS] reporting). All prevention strategies were supported except for increased welfare payments, strict laws and punishment for abusive parents, and more readily available legal ways of severance. Gender and occupation were small but significant predictors of the effectiveness of prevention strategies. Males and physicians rated the strategies as less effective than other groups. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the structure of attitudes towards the 13 prevention strategies. The best fit was provided by a correlated three-factor solution (education, services, and legal remedies).
Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science © 2002 Arizona-Nevada Academy of Sciences