Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Patterns of Animal Diversity in Different Forms of Tree Cover in Agricultural Landscapes

Celia A. Harvey, Arnulfo Medina, Dalia Merlo Sánchez, Sergio Vílchez, Blas Hernández, Joel C. Saenz, Jean Michel Maes, Fernando Casanoves and Fergus L. Sinclair
Ecological Applications
Vol. 16, No. 5 (Oct., 2006), pp. 1986-1999
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40061768
Page Count: 14
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Patterns of Animal Diversity in Different Forms of Tree Cover in Agricultural Landscapes
Preview not available

Abstract

As tropical regions are converted to agriculture, conservation of biodiversity will depend not only on the maintenance of protected forest areas, but also on the scope for conservation within the agricultural matrix in which they are embedded. Tree cover typically retained in agricultural landscapes in the neotropics may provide resources and habitats for animals, but little is known about the extent to which it contributes to conservation of animal species. Here, we explore the animal diversity associated with different forms of tree cover for birds, bats, butterflies, and dung beetles in a pastoral landscape in Nicaragua. We measured species richness and abundance of these four animal taxa in riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, live fences, and pastures with high and low tree cover. We recorded over 20 000 individuals of 189 species including 14 endangered bird species. Mean abundance and species richness of birds and bats, but not dung beetles or butterflies, were significantly different among forms of tree cover. Species richness of bats and birds was positively correlated with tree species richness. While the greatest numbers of bird species were associated with riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, and pastures with >15% tree cover, the greatest numbers of bat species were found in live fences and riparian forest. Species assemblages of all animal taxa were different among tree cover types, so that maintaining a diversity of forms of tree cover led to conservation of more animal species in the landscape as a whole. Overall, the findings indicate that retaining tree cover within agricultural landscapes can help conserve animal diversity, but that conservation efforts need to target forms of tree cover that conserve the taxa that are of interest locally. Preventing the degradation of remaining forest fragments is a priority, but encouraging farmers to maintain tree cover in pastures and along boundaries may also make an important contribution to animal conservation. As tropical regions are converted to agriculture, conservation of biodiversity will depend not only on the maintenance of protected forest areas, but also on the scope for conservation within the agricultural matrix in which they are embedded. Tree cover typically retained in agricultural landscapes in the neotropics may provide resources and habitats for animals, but little is known about the extent to which it contributes to conservation of animal species. Here, we explore the animal diversity associated with different forms of tree cover for birds, bats, butterflies, and dung beetles in a pastoral landscape in Nicaragua. We measured species richness and abundance of these four animal taxa in riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, live fences, and pastures with high and low tree cover. We recorded over 20 000 individuals of 189 species including 14 endangered bird species. Mean abundance and species richness of birds and bats, but not dung beetles or butterflies, were significantly different among forms of tree cover. Species richness of bats and birds was positively correlated with tree species richness. While the greatest numbers of bird species were associated with riparian and secondary forest, forest fallows, and pastures with >15% tree cover, the greatest numbers of bat species were found in live fences and riparian forest. Species assemblages of all animal taxa were different among tree cover types, so that maintaining a diversity of forms of tree cover led to conservation of more animal species in the landscape as a whole. Overall, the findings indicate that retaining tree cover within agricultural landscapes can help conserve animal diversity, but that conservation efforts need to target forms of tree cover that conserve the taxa that are of interest locally. Preventing the degradation of remaining forest fragments is a priority, but encouraging farmers to maintain tree cover in pastures and along boundaries may also make an important contribution to animal conservation.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1986
    1986
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1987
    1987
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1988
    1988
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1989
    1989
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1990
    1990
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1991
    1991
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1992
    1992
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1993
    1993
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1994
    1994
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1995
    1995
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1996
    1996
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1997
    1997
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1998
    1998
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1999
    1999