You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control
Gordon D. Logan, Russell J. Schachar and Rosemary Tannock
Vol. 8, No. 1 (Jan., 1997), pp. 60-64
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40062847
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Propagation delay, Child psychology, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Child psychopathology, Psychology, Conceptual frameworks, Experimentation, Cognitive psychology, Experimental psychology, Developmental psychology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We report an experiment testing the hypothesis that impulsive behavior reflects a deficit in the ability to inhibit prepotent responses. Specifically, we examined whether impulsive people respond more slowly to signals to inhibit (stop signals) than nonimpulsive people. In this experiment, 136 undergraduate students completed an impulsivity questionnaire and then participated in a stop-signal experiment, in which they performed a choice reaction time (go) task and were asked to inhibit their responses to the go task when they heard a stop signal. The delay between the go signal and the stop signal was determined by a tracking procedure designed to allow subjects to inhibit on 50% of the stop-signal trials. Reaction time to the go signal did not vary with impulsivity, but estimated stop-signal reaction time was longer in more impulsive subjects, consistent with the hypothesis and consistent with results from populations with pathological problems with impulse control.
Psychological Science © 1997 Association for Psychological Science