You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures: A Cultural Look at New Look
Shinobu Kitayama, Sean Duffy, Tadashi Kawamura and Jeff T. Larsen
Vol. 14, No. 3 (May, 2003), pp. 201-206
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063889
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Japanese culture, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Asians, Cultural studies, Cultural psychology, Contextual information, Personality psychology, Psychological research, Cognition
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In two studies, a newly devised test (framed-line test) was used to examine the hypothesis that individuals engaging in Asian cultures are more capable of incorporating contextual information and those engaging in North American cultures are more capable of ignoring contextual information. On each trial, participants were presented with a square frame, within which was printed a vertical line. Participants were then shown another square frame of the same or different size and asked to draw a line that was identical to the first line in either absolute length (absolute task) or proportion to the height of the surrounding frame (relative task). The results supported the hypothesis: Whereas Japanese were more accurate in the relative task, Americans were more accurate in the absolute task. Moreover, when engaging in another culture, individuals tended to show the cognitive characteristic common in the host culture.
Psychological Science © 2003 Association for Psychological Science