You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
How Global versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus
Jens Förster and E. Tory Higgins
Vol. 16, No. 8 (Aug., 2005), pp. 631-636
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40064282
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Coffee mugs, Social psychology, Emotion, Personality psychology, Cognitive psychology, Psychology, Motivation, Gestalt psychology, Regulatory theory, Commercial regulation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We propose a reciprocal relation between regulatory-focus systems and global versus local processing styles--Specifically, that global processing fits a promotion focus on advancement, whereas local processing fits a prevention focus on security. In Study 1, participants were shown large letters made of small letters and decided if either of two specific letters appeared on the screen. Strength of promotion focus was positively correlated with speed of processing global letters and negatively correlated with speed of processing local letters, whereas the reverse was true for strength of prevention focus. In Study 2, participants first worked on a global or local task and later chose between two objects. Consistent with our fit proposal, participants who had performed the global task assigned a higher price to their chosen object if they had chosen it in a promotive, eager manner than if they had chosen it in a preventive, vigilant manner, whereas the reverse was true for participants who had performed the local task.
Psychological Science © 2005 Association for Psychological Science