You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Sea Battle Semantics
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-)
Vol. 58, No. 231 (Apr., 2008), pp. 326-335
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St. Andrews
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40208563
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Intuition, Indexicality, Latent semantic analysis, Ocean currents, Semantics, Truth, Garden paths, Gardens, Happiness, Ordinary language philosophy
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The assumption that the future is open makes well known problems for traditional semantics. According to a commonly held intuition, today's occurrence of the sentence 'There will be a sea battle tomorrow', while truth-valueless today, will have a determinate truth-value by tomorrow night. Yet given traditional semantics, sentences that are truth-valueless now cannot later 'become' true. Relativistic semantics has been claimed to do a better job of accommodating intuitions about future contingents than non-reletivistic semantics does. However, intuitions about future contingents cannot by themselves give good reasons for shifting to a new paradigm, for despite the initial appearances, standard non-reletivistic semantics (plus an account of truth-value gaps) can accommodate both intuitions about future contingents.
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) © 2008 Oxford University Press