You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Forbidden Ways of Life
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-)
Vol. 58, No. 233 (Oct., 2008), pp. 618-629
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St. Andrews
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40208663
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Liberalism, Political freedom, Education, Children, Cultural values, Political philosophy, Christianity, Child rearing, Upbringing, Political systems
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonomy-minded liberalism must rule out ways of life that could not develop under an autonomy-promoting education. I conclude by suggesting some reasons why autonomy-minded liberals should bite the bullet and accept this.
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) © 2008 Oxford University Press