You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Weighing Pragmatic and Evidential Reasons for Belief
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
Vol. 138, No. 1 (Mar., 2008), pp. 17-27
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40208857
Page Count: 11
Preview not available
In this paper I argue that we can give a plausible account of how to compare pragmatic and evidential normative reasons for belief. The account I offer is given in the form of a 'defeasing function'. This function allows for a sophisticated comparison of the two types of reasons without assigning complex features to the logical structures of either type of reason.
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition © 2008 Springer