You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Folk Strike Back; or, Why You Didn't Do It Intentionally, Though It Was Bad and You Knew It
Mark T. Phelan and Hagop Sarkissian
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
Vol. 138, No. 2 (Mar., 2008), pp. 291-298
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40208874
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Intentionality, Side effects, Moral judgment, Blame, Intentional action, Psychological assessment, Judgment, Ascriptions, City planning, Reasoning
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Recent and puzzling experimental results suggest that people's judgments as to whether or not an action was performed intentionally are sensitive to moral considerations. In this paper, we outline these results and evaluate two accounts which purport to explain them. We then describe a recent experiment that allegedly vindicates one of these accounts and present our own findings to show that it fails to do so. Finally, we present additional data suggesting no such vindication could be in the offing and that, in fact, both accounts fail to explain the initial, puzzling results they were purported to explain.
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition © 2008 Springer