You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Spontaneous Reports of Most Distressing Concerns in Patients with Inoperable Lung Cancer: At Present, in Retrospect and in Comparison with EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13
Eva Broberger, Carol Tishelman, Louise von Essen, Eva Doukkali and Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
Quality of Life Research
Vol. 16, No. 10 (Dec., 2007), pp. 1635-1645
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212643
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Fatigue, Questionnaires, Symptoms, Dyspnea, Lung neoplasms, Quality of life, Diseases, Pain, Psychological assessment, Nervous system diseases
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Patients with lung cancer experience considerable distress. Therefore, accurate methods for assessing distress and quality of life over time may play a key role for managing and evaluating palliative care. Alternatives to commonly used standardized questionnaires are individual measures. This study prospectively and retrospectively explored the concerns that 46 patients with inoperable lung cancer spontaneously reported as causing most distress close to diagnosis and 6 months later. Changes in content individually generated through a structured inductive freelisting were compared with EORTC-QLQ-C30+ LC13 ratings. The results showed that patients perceived a wide variety of concerns as most distressing and that their concerns changed over time. Between 56 and 62% of these concerns were assessed by items included in the EORTCQLQ-C30+LC13 questionnaires. Furthermore, patients' reports of most distress from fatigue, pain and dyspnea were not always reflected in intensity ratings of comparable EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13 items. These results indicate that items included in standardized measures are not always adequate to assess patients' concerns, priorities and changes over time. In addition to standardized questionnaires, individualized measures may be useful in the clinical palliative setting for providing detailed information about the individual's problems and prioritizations.
Quality of Life Research © 2007 Springer