You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Complementarity of Single-Species and Ecosystem-Oriented Research in Conservation Research
David B. Lindenmayer, Joern Fischer, Adam Felton, Rebecca Montague-Drake, Adrian D. Manning, Dan Simberloff, Kara Youngentob, Debbie Saunders, David Wilson, Annika M. Felton, Caroline Blackmore, Arianne Lowe, Suzi Bond, Nicki Munro and Carole P. Elliott
Vol. 116, No. 7 (Jul., 2007), pp. 1220-1226
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40235167
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Species, Biodiversity conservation, Ecosystem management, Charismatic species, Environmental conservation, Wildlife management, Wildlife conservation, Ecosystems, Amphibians, Conservation biology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
There has been much debate about the relative merits of single-species vs ecosystem-oriented research for conservation. This debate has become increasingly important in recent times as resource managers and policy makers in some jurisdictions focus on ecosystem-level problems. We highlight the potential strengths and limitations of both kinds of research, discuss their complementarity and highlight problems that may arise where competition occurs between the two kinds of research. While a combination of approaches is ideal, a scarcity of funding, time, and expertise means it is impossible to study and manage each species, ecological process, or ecological pattern separately. Making decisions about priorities for the kinds of research, priorities for the kinds of conservation management, and associated allocation of scarce funds is a non-trivial task. We argue for an approach whereby limited resources for conservation research are targeted at projects most likely to close important knowledge gaps, while also promoting ongoing synergies between single-species and ecosystem-oriented research.
Oikos © 2007 Nordic Society Oikos