You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Spacing and Survival in Winter Groups of Willow Tit Parus montanus and Crested Tit P. cristatus--A Removal Study
Jan Ekman, Goran Cederholm and Conny Askenmo
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 50, No. 1 (Feb., 1981), pp. 1-9
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4027
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Spatial distribution, local movements and survival of willow tit and crested tit populations outside the breeding season are examined by removal experiments, and analysed in relation to social structure. (2) In autumn, willow tits gather in small, stable and highly stationary groups using largely non-overlapping ranges, or they adopt a `floater' strategy. Crested tits form similar groups, but floaters were not unambiguously identified. (3) Removed tit groups were quickly replaced by new groups largely within the same group ranges. (4) Floating willow tits switched to a stationary habit in response to removals in autumn. (5) By mid-winter, replacement birds were solely recruited from border groups, and willow tit floaters could not be detected; they probably disappeared due to local mortality in autumn. (6) Experimental reduction of the willow tit density improved winter survival, which compensated for the removals. (7) Juveniles in mixed-age groups survived less well than adults, but in pure juvenile groups they survived equally well as did average members of mixed-age groups. (8) We suggest from these results that (a) the number of groups is limited, (b) group size is limited, (c) group members compete with each other, (d) juveniles are most severely affected by competition, probably through interference from adults, (e) group size is best understood as the result of individual birds seeking a compromise between advantages of a group life and reduced resource availability imposed by dominant group members.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1981 British Ecological Society