You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
T. J. Mawson
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Vol. 64, No. 1 (Aug., 2008), pp. 35-50
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270209
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Omnipotence, Theism, Omniscience, Intuition, Temporality, Beneficence, Prayer, Benevolence, Divinity, Religious studies
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
I argue that Open Theism leads to a retreat from ascribing to God 'complete omniscience'. Having surrendered this ground, the Open Theist cannot but retreat from ascribing to God complete omnipotence; the Open Theist must admit that God might perform actions which He reasonably expected would meet certain descriptions but which nevertheless do not do so. This then makes whatever goodness (in the sense of beneficence, not just benevolence) God has a matter of luck. Open Theism is committed to a partially ignorant God, one who is subject to the vagaries of luck for the efficacy of at least some of His actions and for His goodness.
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion © 2008 Springer