You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Over-Generalization Problem: Predicates Rigidly Signifying the "Unnatural"
Dan López de Sa
Vol. 163, No. 2 (Jul., 2008), pp. 263-272
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40271027
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bachelors, Predicates, Signification, Singular terms, Nominalization, Bodies of water, Rain, River water, Mathematical problems, Spring water
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
According to the simple proposal, a predicate is rigid iff it signifies the same property across the different possible worlds. The simple proposal has been claimed to suffer from an over-generalization problem. Assume that one can make sense of predicates signifying properties, and assume that trivialization concerns, to the effect that the notion would cover any predicate whatsoever, can be overcome. Still, the proposal would over-generalize, the worry has it, by covering predicates for artifactual, social, or evaluative properties, such as 'is a knife,' 'is a bachelor,' or 'is funny.' In defense, it is argued that rigidity for predicates as characterized plays the appropriate theoretical role, and that the contention that "unnatural" properties are not to be rigidly signified is ungrounded.
Synthese © 2008 Springer