You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Error Probabilities for Inference of Causal Directions
Vol. 163, No. 3 (Aug., 2008), pp. 409-418
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40271040
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Sample size, Directed acyclic graphs, Inference, Skeleton, Chlorofluorocarbons, Error rates, Probability distributions, Null hypothesis, Equivalence relation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
A main message from the causal modelling literature in the last several decades is that under some plausible assumptions, there can be statistically consistent procedures for inferring (features of) the causal structure of a set of random variables from observational data. But whether we can control the error probabilities with a finite sample size depends on the kind of consistency the procedures can achieve. It has been shown that in general, under the standard causal Markov and Faithfulness assumptions, the procedures can only be pointwise but not uniformly consistent without substantial background knowledge. This implies the impossibility of choosing a finite sample size to control the worst case error probabilities. In this paper, I consider the simpler task of inferring causal directions when the skeleton of the causal structure is known, and establish a similarly negative result concerning the possibility of controlling error probabilities. Although the result is negative in form, it has an interesting positive implication for causal discovery methods.
Synthese © 2008 Springer