You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
On the Regress Argument for Infinitism
Vol. 166, No. 1 (Jan., 2009), pp. 157-163
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40271162
Page Count: 7
Preview not available
This paper critically evaluates the regress argument for infinitism. The dialectic is essentially this. Peter Klein argues that only an infinitist can, without being dogmatic, enhance the credibility of a questioned non-evident proposition. In response, I demonstrate that a foundationalist can do this equally well. Furthermore, I explain how foundationalism can provide for infinite chains of justification. I conclude that the regress argument for infinitism should not convince us.
Synthese © 2009 Springer