You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Knobe, Side Effects, and the Morally Good Business
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 85, Supplement 1: 14th Annual Vincentian International Conference on Justice for the Poor: A Global Business Ethics (2009), pp. 173-178
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294830
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Side effects, Businesspeople, Profits, Intentionality, Morality, Blame, Altruism, Business structures, Double effect, Intuition
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This paper focuses on Joshua Knobe's experiments which show that people attribute blame and intentionality to the chairman of a company that knowingly causes harmful side effects, but do not attribute praise and intentionality to the chairman of a company that knowingly causes helpful side effects. Knobe's explanation of this data is that people determine intentionality based on the moral consideration of whether the side effect is good or bad. This observation and explanation has come to be known as the "Knobe Effect." One implication from the Knobe Effect is that it seems profit-driven businesses can only intentionally cause harmful and never good side effects. This paper examines the Knobe Effect, and argues for a way that business persons can understand it and avoid its implications. The argument has three parts. The first point is that business persons who care only about profits are blameworthy and rightly should not get credit for good side effects. Second, when a morally praiseworthy person who cares about values other than profits causes side effects, her actions are intentional and praiseworthy. Therefore, profit-driven business persons can be praised for intentionally producing good side effects if they consider other moral values as moral agents should. Finally, morally praiseworthy business persons need only to be Minimally Good Samaritans and not totally altruistic. When a business person strives for profits, adheres to other morally important values, and produces morally good side effects, then we should say that she intentionally caused those effects and is praiseworthy.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2009 Springer