You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Different Pathways That Suggest Whether Auditors' Going Concern Opinions Are Ethically Based
Waymond Rodgers, Andrés Guiral and José A. Gonzalo
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 86, No. 3 (May, 2009), pp. 347-361
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294894
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Virtue ethics, Business audits, Warning systems, Care ethics, Deontological ethics, Financial audits, Financial accounting, Going concerns, Management audits, Ethical behavior
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Several critics have reopened the continuing debate regarding the credibility of the auditing profession in part because of auditors' reluctance to issue warning signals to investors. At the root of auditors' lack of independence issues are conflicts of interest resulting from the structural features of auditor-client relationship. The Throughput Model (TP) is advanced to illustrate how ethical issues may be influenced by conflicts of interest. In the first stage, the TP provides an isolation of auditors' ethical positions from six ethical different perspectives. In the second stage, previous TP theory is built upon by arguing a simultaneous analysis of how conflicts of interests may induce auditors' behavior. We conclude that in the current low litigation risk environment, auditors' ethical behavior (both conscious and unconscious) is clearly ' unbalanced' favoring the reluctance to issue warning signals. Finally, we offer a discussion of potential solutions to improve ethical issues.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2009 Springer