Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Gradients within Gradients: The Mesoscale Distribution Patterns of Palms in a Central Amazonian Forest

Flávia R. C. Costa, Jean-Louis Guillaumet, Albertina P. Lima and Ocirio S. Pereira
Journal of Vegetation Science
Vol. 20, No. 1 (Feb., 2009), pp. 69-78
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40295843
Page Count: 10
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Gradients within Gradients: The Mesoscale Distribution Patterns of Palms in a Central Amazonian Forest
Preview not available

Abstract

Questions: What are the relative contributions of environmental factors and geographic distance to palm community structure at the mesoscale, and how do they depend on the length of the environmental gradient covered? How do soil and topography affect variation of the canopy and understory palm community structure at the mesoscale? How does fine-scale variation within the broad edaphic/topographic classes affect palm community composition? Location: Reserva Ducke, terra-firme forest, Manaus, Brazil. Methods: Palms were sampled in 72 plots 250 m x 4 m, systematically distributed over an area of 100 km² . Soil, topography and distance to watercourses were measured for all plots. The relationship between community structure axes, summarized by NMDS ordinations, and environmental predictors, was analysed with multivariate regressions. Matrix regressions were used to determine the proportions of variance explained by environmental and geographic predictors. Results: Floristic variation at the mesoscale was mostly related to environmental variation, and the proportion of variance explained depended on the amplitude of the environmental gradient. Soil was the main predictor of floristic change, but its effects differed between life forms, with the understory palm community structured within one of the edaphic/topographic classes, in association with distance to watercourses. Conclusions: Dispersal limitation does not explain palm composition at the mesoscale, and the amplitude of environmental gradients covered by the analysis can be as important as the scale of analysis, in determining the relative contributions of environmental and geographical components to community structure. Soil and topography can predict a large proportion of palm composition, but gradients differ in scale, with some environmental gradients being nested within others. Therefore, although all environmental gradients are nested within distance, they do not necessarily coincide.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
69
    69
  • Thumbnail: Page 
70
    70
  • Thumbnail: Page 
71
    71
  • Thumbnail: Page 
72
    72
  • Thumbnail: Page 
73
    73
  • Thumbnail: Page 
74
    74
  • Thumbnail: Page 
75
    75
  • Thumbnail: Page 
76
    76
  • Thumbnail: Page 
77
    77
  • Thumbnail: Page 
78
    78