You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Identifying At-Risk Students in LIS Distributed Learning Courses
Viola Osborn and Philip Turner
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Vol. 43, No. 3 (Summer, 2002), pp. 205-213
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40323964
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: At risk students, College students, Learning, Locus of control, Students, Information science, Educational research, Distance education, Educational levels, Study habits
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The growth in the application of distributed learning in library and information science (LIS) programs has been dramatic. Students in the distributed environment are challenged by the content, as well as by teaching technologies and a radical change in pedagogy. Any negative impact of the distributed learning approach should be minimized. To do so, instructors need to identify students who are particularly at risk and to provide appropriate methods of intervention. TTiis article reports a study in which an instrument to identify high-risk students was developed and tested in LIS distributed learning classes. The survey encompassed thirteen indicators of completion. Educational level, study habits, age, preparation for the course, number of hours worked, and grade point average (GPA) accounted for most of the predictive power in the discriminant analysis of the survey scores. The instrument predicted correctly the completion status of 87.5 percent of the students.
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science © 2002 Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE)