You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Nobody's Argument: Jane Porter and the Historical Novel
Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies
Vol. 7, No. 2 (Fall - Winter, 2007), pp. 88-103
Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339581
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Novels, Novelists, Tales, Literary criticism, Cultural studies, Narrators, Irish literature, Narratives, Literary history, Special collections
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Despite recent scholarly interest in the historical novel and national tale, Jane Porter has not received the critical attention paid to other Romantic-era novelists like Sir Walter Scott, Maria Edgeworth, and Lady Morgan. This essay argues for the importance of Porter's work, in particular her 1803 novel Thaddeus of Warsaw, in the development of the historical novel. The essay's first half examines Porter's literary and epistolary responses to the novels and celebrity of Sir Walter Scott as well as Scott's responses to Porter's work, and then considers explanations for the scholarly neglect of Porter. The second half argues that Thaddeus of Warsaw anticipates several key features of the historical novel identified by GeorgLukács, features that would regularly reappear in the Waverley novels. Porter's interest in human virtue links her to eighteenth-century writers like Mackenzie and Richardson, but she differs from those predecessors in focusing on the actions of virtuous individuals in periods of historical disruption, thus moving the man of feeling onto scenes of revolution.
Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies © 2007 Indiana University Press