You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Why Fundamental Indexation Might—or Might Not—Work
Paul D. Kaplan
Financial Analysts Journal
Vol. 64, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 2008), pp. 32-39
Published by: CFA Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390099
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Some proponents of fundamental indexation daim that the strategy is based on a new theory in which market prices of stocks deviate from fair values. A key assumption in this approach is that fundamental weights are unbiased estimators offair value weights that are statistically independent of market values. This article demonstrates that, except in trivial cases, this assumption is internally inconsistent because the sources of the "errors" are also determinants of market values. The article shows under what conditions fundamental weights are better—or worse—estimators of fair value weights thon are market value weights, thereby demonstrating that the new theory is merely a conjecture. A formula is developed for the value bias inherent in fundamental weighting, and two approaches to combining fundamental and market values are discussed.
Financial Analysts Journal © 2008 CFA Institute