You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Selectivity of Linuron on Tomato and Parsnip
E. J. Hogue and G. F. Warren
Vol. 16, No. 1 (Jan., 1968), pp. 51-54
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4041371
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Parsnips, Plants, Herbicides, Plant roots, Radioactive decay, Photosynthesis, Leaves, Metabolism, Carrots, Weed control
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In a study of the selective action of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron), parsnip (Pastinaca sativa L., var. Harris Model) possessed a high degree of tolerance as compared to tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill., var. Kokomo). Linuron was readily taken up by the roots of tomato and distributed throughout the plant, but it remained mostly in the roots of parsnip. Linuron in the leaves of parsnip was metabolized, to a great extent, while very little of the metabolite (s) was found in tomato. The herbicide caused rapid and complete inhibition of photosynthesis in tomato, and the plants never recovered. Photosynthesis in parsnip was inhibited but only temporarily. Therefore, it appears that the selectivity of linuron on these two species may be explained by the two mechanisms of differential accumulation in the foliage and metabolism of the herbicide.
Weed Science © 1968 Weed Science Society of America