You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Evolved Resistance to Glyphosate in Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia
Stephen B. Powles, Debrah F. Lorraine-Colwill, James J. Dellow and Christopher Preston
Vol. 46, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1998), pp. 604-607
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4045968
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Herbicide resistance, Herbicides, At risk population, Plants, Weed control, Dose response relationship, Lethal dose 50, Species, Crops, Seedlings
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Following 15 yr of successful use, glyphosate failed to control a population of the widespread grass weed rigid ryegrass in Australia. This population proved to be resistant to glyphosate in pot dose-response experiments conducted outdoors, exhibiting 7- to 11-fold resistance when compared to a susceptible population. Some cross-resistance to diclofop-methyl (about 2.5-fold) was also observed. Similar levels of control of the resistant and susceptible populations were obtained following application of amitrole, chlorsulfuron, fluazifop-P-butyl, paraquat, sethoxydim, simazine, or tralkoxydim. The presence of glyphosate resistance in a major weed species indicates a need for changes in glyphosate use patterns.
Weed Science © 1998 Weed Science Society of America