You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Structural Basis for Ligand and Substrate Recognition by Torovirus Hemagglutinin Esterases
Martijn A. Langereis, Qinghong Zeng, Gerrit J. Gerwig, Barbara Frey, Mark von Itzstein, Johannis P. Kamerling, Raoul J. de Groot, Eric G. Huizinga and Peter Palese
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 106, No. 37 (Sep. 15, 2009), pp. 15897-15902
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40484819
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Hemagglutinin esterases (HEs), closely related envelope glycoproteins in influenza C and corona-and toroviruses, mediate reversible attachment to O-acetylated sialic acids (Sias). They do so by acting both as lectins and as receptor-destroying enzymes, functions exerted by separate protein domains. HE divergence was accompanied by changes in quaternary structure and in receptor and substrate specificity. The selective forces underlying HE diversity and the molecular basis for Sia specificity are poorly understood. Here we present crystal structures of porcine and bovine torovirus HEs in complex with receptor analogs. Torovirus HEs form homodimers with sialate-Oacetylesterase domains almost identical to corresponding domains in orthomyxo-and coronavirus HEs, but with unique lectin sites. Structure-guided biochemical analysis of the esterase domains revealed that a functionally, but not structurally conserved arginine-Sia carboxylate interaction is critical for the binding and positioning of glycosidically bound Sias in the catalytic pocket. Although essential for efficient de-O-acetylation of Sias, this interaction is not required for catalysis nor does it affect substrate specificity. In fact the distinct preference of the porcine torovirus enzyme for 9-mono-over 7,9-di-O-acetylated Sias can be explained from a single-residue difference with HEs of more promiscuous specificity. Apparently, esterase and lectin pockets coevolved; also the porcine torovirus HE receptorbinding site seems to have been designed to use 9-mono-and exclude di-O-acetylated Sias, possibly as an adaptation to replication in swine. Our findings shed light on HE evolution and provide fundamental insight into mechanisms of substrate binding, substrate recognition, and receptor selection in this important class of virion proteins.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2009 National Academy of Sciences