Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Affective Loop Experiences: Designing for Interactional Embodiment

Kristina Höök
Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences
Vol. 364, No. 1535, Computation of Emotions in Man and Machines (Dec. 12, 2009), pp. 3585-3595
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40538152
Page Count: 11
Subjects: General Science Biological Sciences
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Affective Loop Experiences: Designing for Interactional Embodiment
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

Involving our corporeal bodies in interaction can create strong affective experiences. Systems that both can be influenced by and influence users corporeally exhibit a use quality we name an affective loop experience. In an affective loop experience, (i) emotions are seen as processes, constructed in the interaction, starting from everyday bodily, cognitive or social experiences; (ii) the system responds in ways that pull the user into the interaction, touching upon end users' physical experiences; and (iii) throughout the interaction the user is an active, meaning-making individual choosing how to express themselves— the interpretation responsibility does not lie with the system. We have built several systems that attempt to create affective loop experiences with more or less successful results. For example, eMoto lets users send text messages between mobile phones, but in addition to text, the messages also have colourful and animated shapes in the background chosen through emotion-gestures with a sensor-enabled stylus pen. Affective Diary is a digital diary with which users can scribble their notes, but it also allows for bodily memorabilia to be recorded from body sensors mapping to users' movement and arousal and placed along a timeline. Users can see patterns in their bodily reactions and relate them to various events going on in their lives. The experiences of building and deploying these systems gave us insights into design requirements for addressing affective loop experiences, such as how to design for turn-taking between user and system, how to create for ' open' surfaces in the design that can carry users' own meaning-making processes, how to combine modalities to create for a ' unity' of expression, and the importance of mirroring user experience in familiar ways that touch upon their everyday social and corporeal experiences. But a more important lesson gained from deploying the systems is how emotion processes are co-constructed and experienced inseparable from all other aspects of everyday life. Emotion processes are part of our social ways of being in the world; they dye our dreams, hopes and bodily experiences of the world. If we aim to design for affective interaction experiences, we need to place them into this larger picture.

Notes and References

This item contains 41 references.

Endnotes
  • 1
    (Löwgren & Stolterman 2004; Löwgren 2007).
  • 2
    (Sundström et al. 2007).
References
  • Aoki, P. M. & Woodruff, A. 2005 Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 181-190. New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P. & Sengers, P. 2005 Affect: from information to interaction. Critical Comput- ing Conf. Arhus, Denmark, 2005.
  • Damasio, A. R. 1994 Descartes' error: emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
  • Darwin, C. 1872 The expression of emotions in man and animals. London, UK: John Murray.
  • Davidson, R. J., Pizzagalli, D., Nitschke, J. B. & Kalin, N. H. 2003 Parsing the subcomponents of emotion and disorders of emotion: perspectives from affective neuroscience. In Handbook of affective sciences (eds R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith), pp. 8-24. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Dewey, T. 1934 Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee.
  • DeWitt, A. & Bresin, R. 2007 Sound design for affective interaction. In Affective computing and intelligent interaction (eds A. Paiva, R. Prada & R. W. Picard), pp. 523-533. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B. & Stienstra, M. 2007 Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput., special issue on movement-based design 11, 657-676. (doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0137-9)
  • Dourish, P. 2004 Where the action is: the foundations of embo- died interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fallman, D. 2003 In romance with the materials of mobile interaction: a phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology. Doctoral thesis. Umeá University, Sweden: Larsson & Co:s Tryckeri.
  • Ferreira, P., Sanches, P., Höök, K. & Jaensson, T. 2008 License to chill! How to empower users to cope with stress. Proc. Nordic Forum for Human -Computer Interaction Research (NordiCHI). Lund, Sweden: ACM Press.
  • Grosz, E. 1994 Volatile bodies: toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
  • Harper, R., Randall, D., Smyth, N., Evans, C, Heledd, L. & Moore, R. 2007 Thanks for the memory. Interact: HCI 2007, September, Lancaster.
  • Hummels, C, Overbeeke, K. C. & Klooster, S. 2007 Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based inter- action. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 11, 677-690.
  • Hutchinson, H. et al. 2003 Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
  • Höök, K. 2006 Designing familiar open surfaces. Proc. of NordiCHI 2006, Oslo, Norway, October 2006. ACM Press.
  • Höök, K., Stahl, A., Sundström, P. & Laaksolahti, J. 2008 Interactional empowerment. ACM SIGCHI Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI2008). Florence, Italy, ACM Press.
  • Kaye, J. J. 2006 I just clicked to say i love you: rich evalu- ations of minimal communication. Alt. chi, Ext. Abs. CHI 2006. New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Laban, R. & Lawrence, F. C. 1974 Effort, economy of human effort, 2nd edn. London, UK: Macdonald & Evans Ltd.
  • LeDoux, J. E. 1996 The emotional brain: the mysterious under- pinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Löwgren, J. 2007 Inspirational patterns for embodied interaction. J. Knowl. Technol. Policy 20, 165-177.
  • Löwgren, J. & Stolterman, E. 2004 Thoughtful interaction design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • McCarthy, J. & Wright, P. 2004 Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962 Phenomenology of perception. Smith, C. (translator). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Michael, M. 2000 These boots are made for walking ... : mundane technology, the body and human -environment relations. J. Body Soc. 6, 107-126. (doi:10.1177/ 1357034X00006003006)
  • Moen, J. 2006 KinAesthetic movement interaction. Design- ing for the pleasure of motion. Unpublished doctoral thesis in HCI, KTH, Sweden.
  • Paiva, A., Costa, M., Chaves, R., Piedade, M., Mourão, D., Sobral, D., Höök, K., Andersson, G. & Bullock, A. 2003 SenToy: an affective sympathetic interface. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 227-235 (doi:10.1016/S1071- 5819(03)00048-X)
  • Russell, J. A. 1980 Circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol, 39, 1161-1178, APA. (doi:10.1037/h0077714)
  • Strong, R. & Gaver, W. W 1996 Feather, scent, and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. Proc. CSCW 96, November 16-20, Boston.
  • Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Warner, S. & Jenkins, T 2005 Evaluating affector: co-interpreting what 'works'. CHI 2005 Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Evaluating Affective Systems.
  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. 1999 Emotion and movement: a beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 259-277.
  • Ståhl, A. 2006 Designing for emotional expressivity. Licentiate thesis in design, Umeá Design Institute. Umeå University Sweden.
  • Ståhl, A. & Höök, K., 2008 Reflecting on the design process of the Affective Diary. Proc. ACM NordiCHI 20-22 Octo- ber 2008. Lund, Sweden, pp. 559-564. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Ståhl, A., Sundström, P. & Höök, K., 2005 A foundation for emotional expressivity. DUX 2005. New York, NY: American Institute of Graphic Arts.
  • Ståhl, A., Höök, K., Svensson, M., Taylor, A. & Combetto, M. 2008 Experiencing the affective diary. J. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput.
  • Suchman, L. A. 1997 From interactions to integrations. In Proc. Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT97 (eds. S. Howard, J. Hammond & G. Lindegaard). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
  • Sundström, P., Ståhl, A. & Höök, K. 2007 In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., in a special issue on evaluating affective interfaces, 65, 388-403 (doi:10.1016/J.iJhCS.2006.11.013)
  • Sundström, P., Jaensson, T., Höök, K. & Pommeranz, A. 2009 Probing the potential of non-verbal group com- munication. Proc. Group. ACM Press.
  • Troshynski, E., Lee, C. & Dourish, P. 2008 Accountabilities of presence: refraining location-based systems. Proc. ACM CHI 2008 Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems April 5-10, 2008, pp. 487-496.