You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Y: Toward a Construct-valid Measure
Richard E. Kopelman, David J. Prottas and Anne L. Davis
Journal of Managerial Issues
Vol. 20, No. 2 (Summer 2008), pp. 255-271
Published by: Pittsburg State University
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604607
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Measure theory, Management principles, Fast food, Organizational behavior, Business management, Psychological attitudes, Attitude scales, Factor analysis, Test theory, Motivation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Douglas McGregor's landmark book, The Human Side of Enterprise, changed the path of management thinking and practice by questioning fundamental assumptions about human behavior in organizations. Although nearly 50 years have passed since McGregor's initial formulation of Theory X and Theory Y, the substantive validity of his theorizing on the effects of individual differences in managerial assumptions has remained virtually unexamined. In our view, the paucity of substantive research is attributable to the absence of a published measure of Theory X/Y managerial assumptions with adequate construct validity. This article describes the development and validation of such a measure. The pattern of correlations between the focal measure and conceptually identical, closely related, distally related, and unrelated measures (rs = .66, .51, .25, and -.01, respectively) provides evidence of convergent, substantive, and discriminant validity. We see the present research as conceptually contributory in that we distinguish between practices consonant with Theory Y and managerial attitudes per se. Our work is empirically contributory by providing a construct-valid measure of Theory X/Y managerial assumptions, an instrument that permits the conduct of substantive research. Finally, if McGregor's theorizing is correct— and that remains to be determined— there are significant potential practical implications for the management of human behavior in organizations.
Journal of Managerial Issues © 2008 Pittsburg State University