Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

A portfolio model for performance assessment: the Financial Times MBA ranking

A Jessop
The Journal of the Operational Research Society
Vol. 61, No. 4 (April 2010), pp. 632-639
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40608186
Page Count: 8
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
A portfolio model for performance assessment: the
              Financial Times
              MBA ranking
Preview not available

Abstract

The ranking of MBA programmes by newspapers and magazines is common and usually controversial. This paper discusses the use of the most popular method of making these rankings via a multicriteria model which uses the weighted sum of a number of performance measures to give an overall score on which selection or ranking may be based. The weights are a quantitative model of the preferences of those making the evaluation. Many methods are available to obtain weights from preference statements so that for any set of preferences a number of different weight sets can be found depending on the method used. Cognitive limits lead to inconsistency in preference judgements so that weights may be subject both to uncertainty and to bias. It is proposed that choosing weights to minimize discrimination between alternatives (not weights) guards against unjustified discrimination between alternatives. Applying the method to data collected by the Financial Times shows the effect of varying the level of discrimination between weights and also the effect of using a reduced data set made necessary by the partial publication of information.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[632]
    [632]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
633
    633
  • Thumbnail: Page 
634
    634
  • Thumbnail: Page 
635
    635
  • Thumbnail: Page 
636
    636
  • Thumbnail: Page 
637
    637
  • Thumbnail: Page 
638
    638
  • Thumbnail: Page 
639
    639