You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Commuters' Exposure to Particulate Matter Air Pollution Is Affected by Mode of Transport, Fuel Type, and Route
Moniek Zuurbier, Gerard Hoek, Marieke Oldenwening, Virissa Lenters, Kees Meliefste, Peter van den Hazel and Bert Brunekreef
Environmental Health Perspectives
Vol. 118, No. 6 (JUNE 2010), pp. 783-789
Published by: The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40661594
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Diesel buses, Electric buses, Diesel vehicles, Bicycles, Automobiles, Air pollution, Soot, City buses, Motor vehicle traffic, Passengers
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
Background: Commuters are exposed to high concentrations of air pollutants, but little quantitative information is currently available on differences in exposure between different modes of transport, routes, and fuel types. Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess differences in commuters' exposure to traffic-related air pollution related to transport mode, route, and fuel type. Methods: We measured particle number counts (PNCs) and concentrations of PM₂.₅ (particulate matter ≤ 2.5 um in aerodynamic diameter), PM₁₀, and soot between June 2007 and June 2008 on 47 weekdays, from 0800 to 1000 hours, in diesel and electric buses, gasoline-and diesel-fueled cars, and along two bicycle routes with different traffic intensities in Arnhem, the Netherlands. In addition, each-day measurements were taken at an urban background location. Results: We found that median PNC exposures were highest in diesel buses (38,500 particles/cm³) and for cyclists along the high-traffic intensity route (46,600 particles/cm 3 ) and lowest in electric buses (29,200 particles/cm³). Median PM₁₀ exposure was highest from diesel buses (47 μg/m³) and lowest along the high-and low-traffic bicycle routes (39 and 37 μg/m³). The median soot exposure was highest in gasoline-fueled cars (9.0 х 10⁻⁵/m), diesel cars (7.9 х 10⁻⁵/m), and diesel buses (7.4 х 10⁻⁵/m) and lowest along the low-traffic bicycle route (4.9 х 10⁻⁵/m). Because the minute ventilation (volume of air per minute) of cyclists, which we estimated from measured heart rates, was twice the minute ventilation of car and bus passengers, we calculated that the inhaled air pollution doses were highest for cyclists. With the exception of PM₁₀, we found that inhaled air pollution doses were lowest for electric bus passengers. Conclusions: Commuters' rush hour exposures were significantly influenced by mode of transport, route, and fuel type.
Environmental Health Perspectives © 2010 The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences