Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Macroeconomic Performance During Adjustment: The Case of Bangladesh

Salma Chaudhuri Zohir
The Bangladesh Development Studies
Vol. 25, No. 3/4 (Sept.- Dec. 1997), pp. 99-128
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40795581
Page Count: 30
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Macroeconomic Performance During Adjustment: The Case of Bangladesh
Preview not available

Abstract

The present study attempts to look into the impact of structural adjustment on macroeconomic performance covering the period up to 1992/93. The "before-after" approach is the most widely used approach and hence has been used for the analysis of this paper. The analysis suggests that the structural adjustment policies in Bangladesh has been implemented gradually, with policy changes introduced in phases. The review of macroeconomic performance suggests that the nature of structural adjustment pursued may be termed as "corrective": it improved the fiscal and external balances but at the cost of reduced public investment and stagnant GDP growth at around 4 per cent during the adjustment period. The decline in public investment appears to have affected private investment. Bangladesh had only meagre foreign investment. Desirable structural adjustment policies should lead to expansion of tradable output. But contrary to the expectation, the output growth in the tradable sector was significantly lower than that of non-tradables. The share of expenditure in GDP remained at around 15 per cent. Although the share of social sectors as a whole increased slightly, that of the health sector has fallen during the adjustment period. The structure of export changed from traditional to non-traditional. Export growth was larger than the target due to expansion in readymade garment and knitwear. Under the MFA, Bangladesh has guaranteed access to the US market and under the GSP, Bangladesh has unrestricted duty-free entry into the countries of the European Union, which gave it a competitive edge over other exporting countries. The phasing out of preferential access by the year 2005 is a matter of great concern. In order to survive beyond 2005, there is an urgent need to set up backward linkages domestic textile industries.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[99]
    [99]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
100
    100
  • Thumbnail: Page 
101
    101
  • Thumbnail: Page 
102
    102
  • Thumbnail: Page 
103
    103
  • Thumbnail: Page 
104
    104
  • Thumbnail: Page 
105
    105
  • Thumbnail: Page 
106
    106
  • Thumbnail: Page 
107
    107
  • Thumbnail: Page 
108
    108
  • Thumbnail: Page 
109
    109
  • Thumbnail: Page 
110
    110
  • Thumbnail: Page 
111
    111
  • Thumbnail: Page 
112
    112
  • Thumbnail: Page 
113
    113
  • Thumbnail: Page 
114
    114
  • Thumbnail: Page 
115
    115
  • Thumbnail: Page 
116
    116
  • Thumbnail: Page 
117
    117
  • Thumbnail: Page 
118
    118
  • Thumbnail: Page 
119
    119
  • Thumbnail: Page 
120
    120
  • Thumbnail: Page 
121
    121
  • Thumbnail: Page 
122
    122
  • Thumbnail: Page 
123
    123
  • Thumbnail: Page 
124
    124
  • Thumbnail: Page 
125
    125
  • Thumbnail: Page 
126
    126
  • Thumbnail: Page 
127
    127
  • Thumbnail: Page 
128
    128