You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Natal Dispersal and Philopatry of Red Foxes in Urban and Agricultural Areas of Illinois
TODD E. GOSSELINK, KIMBERLY A. PICCOLO, TIMOTHY R. VAN DEELEN, RICHARD E. WARNER and PHIL MANKIN
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 74, No. 6 (August 2010), pp. 1204-1217
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40801115
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Foxes, Urban habitats, Habitat selection, Wildlife management, Juveniles, Mortality, Urban agriculture, Urban areas, Habitat conservation, Family members
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Dispersal and philopatry may be influenced by habitat, intraspecific and interspecific interactions, and resource quality.Dispersal may vary substantially between urban and rural wildlife populations due to differences in urban-rural habitat and trophic relationships. We examined effects of environmental, body condition, and social influences on dispersal and philopatry of urban and rural red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in east-central Illinois and western Indiana, USA. We recorded 96 dispersal events and 66 cases of philopatry in juvenile foxes. We used Akaike's Information Criterion to evaluate regression models of dispersal probability, initiation date, distance, and days spent dispersing. Habitat (i. e., urban-rural), sex, row-crop percentage in natal home ranges, family home-range overlap, and social interactions with family members all influenced dispersal probability. Juvenile foxes with fewer row crops in their home ranges, individuals with high intrafamilial overlap of summer range, females, and urban foxes were associated with philopatry. Dispersals began mid-September and ended in March. Rural juveniles dispersed 23 days earlier than did urban conspecifics. Heavier foxes (capture wt) and those with heavily row-cropped home ranges dispersed earlier. Littermates dispersed at similar times, although in different directions. Dispersal distances averaged 44.8 km for all foxes (range = 1-478 km). Male and urban foxes dispersed farther than female and rural foxes, respectively. Time between dispersal and settlement averaged 41.2 days (range = 2-114 days), with urban foxes dispersing over longer time periods. Dispersal direction between the sexes had different directional distributions, though mean vectors for both were oriented north. Dispersing foxes selected cropland in proportion to availability, whereas grassland was selected preferentially. We demonstrate influences of habitat, resource availability, familial social interactions, and interspecific interactions on dispersal and philopatry of juvenile red foxes in an intensively row-cropped region of the Midwest.Our findings demonstrate red fox dispersal ecology differences in urban and rural environments. In intensively row-cropped regions of the Midwest where landscape crop harvest alters dispersal timing, minimizing seasonal habitat changes with permanent vegetative structure (e. g., crop food plots, native grass fields) would likely delay dispersal activity, and increase survival.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 2010 Wiley