You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Seasonal Variation in the Foraging Behavior of Some Migratory Western Wood Warblers
Richard L. Hutto
Vol. 98, No. 4 (Oct., 1981), pp. 765-777
Published by: American Ornithological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4085897
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Foraging, Species, Warblers, Birds, Population ecology, Forest habitats, Vegetation, Synecology, Plant ecology, Ecological competition
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
I observed the foraging behavior of four warbler species (Dendroica petechia, Oporornis tolmiei, Geothlypis trichas, and Wilsonia pusilla) in the summer in Wyoming and in the winter in Nayarit, México. Of six variables (absolute foraging height, relative foraging height, vegetation density, horizontal foraging position, feeding method, and foraging substrate) believed to be potentially important in distinguishing the warbler species ecologically, the two foraging-height variables provided the greatest separation of the four species in both summer and winter. An analysis of the behavioral similarity of each species from summer to winter revealed that feeding method was the least changed behavior and that absolute foraging height involved the greatest behavioral flexibility. The behaviors that are most flexible are possibly the least well tied to the birds' morphology and are also the ones that have been shown by other workers to reveal the effects of competitors through "niche shifts." Therefore, ecological relationships among coexisting species (in terms of overlaps or positions in niche space) may never be fully derivable from morphological information alone.
The Auk © 1981 American Ornithologists' Union