You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
A novel approach to estimate the minimally important difference for the fatigue impact scale in multiple sclerosis patients
Regina Rendas-Baum, Min Yang, Francoise Cattelin, Gene V. Wallenstein and John D. Fisk
Quality of Life Research
Vol. 19, No. 9 (November 2010), pp. 1349-1358
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40927182
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Fatigue, Multiple sclerosis, Quality of life, Disabilities, Neurology, Estimation methods, Mental health, Standard deviation, Ratios, Psychometrics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Purpose The Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) has been used extensively to assess the impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the FIS to facilitate the interpretation of the scale in patients with MS. Methods Data came from a cross-sectional study of 184 patients with MS. Anchor-based estimates of the MID were evaluated using patients' ratings of their own health and a clinical rating of MS severity. Using the proportional odds model, estimates of the MID were evaluated by finding FIS score differences that corresponded to a 50% increase in the odds of poorer health. Convergence between distribution-and anchor-based estimates was assessed. Results Nineteen items met the selection criteria for anchors. Triangulation of the anchor- and distributionbased approaches indicated that the MID of the FIS ranged between 10 and 20 points, approximately. Conclusion A common metric of meaningful difference of FIS was defined across anchors measuring a broad range of HRQOL domains. The MID estimates in the current study can be used for sample size calculation in the planning of future studies and to aid researchers and clinicians in interpreting FIS score differences in patients with MS.
Quality of Life Research © 2010 Springer