You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Constitutional Interpretation: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Aside a Constitutional Amendment Requiring a Two-Thirds Majority for Passing a Tax Increase Because It Conflicts with a Substantive Constitutional Right. Guinn v. Legislature of Nevada, 71 P.3d 1269 (Nev. 2003)
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 117, No. 3 (Jan., 2004), pp. 972-979
Published by: The Harvard Law Review Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093467
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Education legislation, Tax legislation, Education, Separation of powers, Funding, Appropriations legislation, Statutory interpretation, Taxes, Western canon, Finance
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!