If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Constitutional Interpretation: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Aside a Constitutional Amendment Requiring a Two-Thirds Majority for Passing a Tax Increase Because It Conflicts with a Substantive Constitutional Right. Guinn v. Legislature of Nevada, 71 P.3d 1269 (Nev. 2003)

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 117, No. 3 (Jan., 2004), pp. 972-979
DOI: 10.2307/4093467
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093467
Page Count: 8
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Constitutional Interpretation: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Aside a Constitutional Amendment Requiring a Two-Thirds Majority for Passing a Tax Increase Because It Conflicts with a Substantive Constitutional Right. Guinn v. Legislature of Nevada, 71 P.3d 1269 (Nev. 2003)
Preview not available

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
972
    972
  • Thumbnail: Page 
973
    973
  • Thumbnail: Page 
974
    974
  • Thumbnail: Page 
975
    975
  • Thumbnail: Page 
976
    976
  • Thumbnail: Page 
977
    977
  • Thumbnail: Page 
978
    978
  • Thumbnail: Page 
979
    979