You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Population Status and Habitat Selection of the Endangered Key Largo Woodrat
Robert A. McCleery, Roel R. Lopez, Nova J. Silvy, Philip A. Frank and Steven B. Klett
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 155, No. 1 (Jan., 2006), pp. 197-209
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4094704
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Over the last two decades, declines in trap success, stick-nest density and population density estimates have fueled concerns that the federally endangered Key Largo woodrat (KLWR, Neotoma floridana smalli) population is declining. Information on the current population status and habitat selection of KLWR is needed in the recovery of this population. We trapped on 60 (1-ha) randomly-placed grids (20 grids in each of three hardwood hammock age-classes). Grids were trapped from March-September 2002 and April-August 2004. Population estimates for the two trapping periods were 106 (95% CI 30-182) and 40 (95% CI 5-104) individuals, respectively. Greater than 80% of all KLWRs captures occurred in the young hammock age-classes (disturbed after 1971). Young hammocks were characterized by a more open canopy, smaller overstory trees, fewer logs, greater dispersion of overstory trees and a different species composition than old and medium age hammocks (P < 0.024). Contrary to previous research, KLWRs were found to nest in rock piles and garbage piles more than other materials. Results from this study suggest the KLWR population is critically low and management efforts should focus on the creation and restoration of young hammock habitats.
The American Midland Naturalist © 2006 The University of Notre Dame