Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

When Rensch Meets Bergmann: Does Sexual Size Dimorphism Change Systematically with Latitude?

Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, R. Craig Stillwell, Kyle A. Young, Charles W. Fox and Kyle G. Ashton
Evolution
Vol. 60, No. 10 (Oct., 2006), pp. 2004-2011
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4095351
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($4.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
When Rensch Meets Bergmann: Does Sexual Size Dimorphism Change Systematically with Latitude?
Preview not available

Abstract

Bergmann's and Rensch's rules describe common large-scale patterns of body size variation, but their underlying causes remain elusive. Bergmann's rule states that organisms are larger at higher latitudes (or in colder climates). Rensch's rule states that male body size varies (or evolutionarily diverges) more than female body size among species, resulting in slopes greater than one when male size is regressed on female size. We use published studies of sex-specific latitudinal body size clines in vertebrates and invertebrates to investigate patterns equivalent to Rensch's rule among populations within species and to evaluate their possible relation to Bergmann's rule. Consistent with previous studies, we found a continuum of Bergmann (larger at higher latitudes: 58 species) and converse Bergmann body size clines (larger at lower latitudes: 40 species). Ignoring latitude, male size was more variable than female size in only 55 of 98 species, suggesting that intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism does not generally conform to Rensch's rule. In contrast, in a significant majority of species (66 of 98) male latitudinal body size clines were steeper than those of females. This pattern is consistent with a latitudinal version of Rensch's rule, and suggests that some factor that varies systematically with latitude is responsible for producing Rensch's rule among populations within species. Identifying the underlying mechanisms will require studies quantifying latitudinal variation in sex-specific natural and sexual selection on body size.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
2004
    2004
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2005
    2005
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2006
    2006
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2007
    2007
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2008
    2008
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2009
    2009
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2010
    2010
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2011
    2011