You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Social Science and the Courts: Challenges and Strategies for Bridging Gaps Between Law and Research
Julie Margetta Morgan and Diana Pullin
Vol. 39, No. 7 (OCTOBER 2010), pp. 515-524
Published by: American Educational Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40963352
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social sciences, Legal evidence, Educational research, School districts, Amicus curiae briefs, Empirical evidence, Judges, Legal briefs, Education, Parents
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Social scientists collect vital information that bears on issues of education policy. When the courts are faced with an opportunity to make a decision that shapes education, judges need access to highquality research, but they must also be convinced that it can be useful in their decision making. This article approaches the question of how social science can be made more effective in judicial decision making. The authors examine the use of social science evidence by the courts and the theories of jurisprudence that bear on its effectiveness. As an example of the difficulty of influencing the outcome of a case, they review the U.S. Supreme Court's decision involving the use of race in school assignments in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. I (2007).
Educational Researcher © 2010 American Educational Research Association