You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Monitoring methodology for gaseous hazards: Passive monitors and portable instruments
Mary L Woebkenberg
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Vol. 9, No. 2, Proceedings of the Second US-Finnish Joint Symposium on Occupational Safety and Health: Helsinki, 24 - 26 May 1982 (April 1983), pp. 223-229
Published by: the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, the Danish National Research Centre for the Working Environment, and the Norwegian National Institute of Occupational Health
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40964406
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Reliable sampling and analytical procedures for monitoring workplace hazards must be developed and evaluated. In the present communication three studies involving the evaluation and development of personal monitoring techniques were presented. The first study described an evaluation of three passive monitors for organic solvent vapors. Toluene, trichloroethylene, n-hexane, acetone, methylene chloride, and vinyl chloride, each at three concentrations, as well as effects of temperature, humidity, linear adsorption capacity, variable concentration, complex solvent mixture, and storage time, were addressed. The results indicated that under specified conditions passive monitors are viable monitoring methods. The second study was an evaluation of two carbon monoxide dosimeters. Instrument accuracy, precision, and performance under a variety of experimental conditions were examined. Sufficient samples were taken to show that the Energetics Science series 9000 dosimeter was within ± 25 % of the true value 95 % of the time. The General Electric model 15ECS1CO2 did not meet this same criterion. The third study describes the development of a unique sampling method for nitrogen dioxide using Poroplastic® film impregnated with the absorbing liquid and a spacing material which allows for airflow and distribution to the absorber. The overall method, evaluated over the concentration range of 0.9 to 19 µg/1 in 36-1 samples, had an average bias of 7 % with a coefficient of variation of 10 %.
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health © 1983 Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health