You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Challenges to retrospective exposure assessment
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Vol. 25, No. 6, Special Issue (December 1999), pp. 505-510
Published by: the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, the Danish National Research Centre for the Working Environment, and the Norwegian National Institute of Occupational Health
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40966941
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Epidemiology, Estimation methods, Industrial hygiene, Questionnaires, Personnel evaluation, Chemicals, Disease risk, Workplaces, Estimate reliability, Statistical estimation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Retrospective exposure assessment has become a crucial component in the interpretation of occupational epidemiologie results. Many advances have been made over the last 2 decades, but substantial progress is still necessary to reduce the misclassification of exposure. The efforts needed include evaluating the validity and reliability of assessment methods, better documentation of the methods, use of exposure determinants to estimate exposure levels more accurately and reliably, and an increase in the understanding of industrial hygiene and biological measurement data and questionnaires, their limitations, and how to use them best. In addition, better characterization of exposures is necessary. This need includes evaluating dermal and ingestion hazards, incorporating nonoccupational sources of exposures, particularly hobbies, evaluating the effect of multiple chemicals, and exploring different exposure metrics.
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health © 1999 Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health