You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attention-driven auditory cortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise
Jyrki Ahveninen, Matti Hämäläinen, liro P. Jääskeläinen, Seppo P. Ahlfors, Samantha Huang, Fa-Hsuan Lin, Tommi Raij, Mikko Sams, Christos E. Vasios, John W. Belliveau and Robert Desimone
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 108, No. 10 (March 8, 2011), pp. 4182-4187
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41061081
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Auditory cortex, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neurons, Selective attention, Audio frequencies, Acoustic noise, Signal noise, Ears, Acoustic data, Behavioral neuroscience
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
How can we concentrate on relevant sounds in noisy environments? A "gain model" suggests that auditory attention simply amplifies relevant and suppresses irrelevant afferent inputs. However, it is unclear whether this suffices when attended and ignored features overlap to stimulate the same neuronal receptive fields. A "tuning model" suggests that in addition to gain, attention modulates feature selectivity of auditory neurons. We recorded magnetoencephalography, EEG, and functional MRI (fMRI) while subjects attended to tones delivered to one ear and ignored opposite-ear inputs. The attended ear was switched every 30 s to quantify how quickly the effects evolve. To produce overlapping inputs, the tones were presented alone vs. during white-noise masking notch-filtered ± 1/6 octaves around the tone center frequencies. Amplitude modulation (39 vs. 41 Hz in opposite ears) was applied for "frequency tagging" of attention effects on maskers. Noise masking reduced early (50-150 ms; N1) auditory responses to unattended tones. In support of the tuning model, selective attention canceled out this attenuating effect but did not modulate the gain of 50-150 ms activity to nonmasked tones or steady-state responses to the maskers themselves. These tuning effects originated at nonprimary auditory cortices, purportedly occupied by neurons that, without attention, have wider frequency tuning than ± 1/6 octaves. The attentional tuning evolved rapidly, during the first few seconds after attention switching, and correlated with behavioral discrimination performance. In conclusion, a simple gain model alone cannot explain auditory selective attention. In nonprimary auditory cortices, attention-driven short-term plasticity retunes neurons to segregate relevant sounds from noise.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2011 National Academy of Sciences