You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Society, Politics and Demography: The Example of Soviet History
Czech Sociological Review
Vol. 4, No. 1 (SPRING 1996), pp. 81-95
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41106927
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Demography, Russian history, Political revolutions, Disasters, Political power, Political freedom, Political particularism, Desire, Territories, Censuses
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Of particular interest within the history of the USSR is how a very strong political desire to disrupt society, its foundations, its structure and its functioning wholly achieved these goals. The notably uneven history of the USSR leads the author to examine the marks it left on social behavioural patterns. This article - with the analysis both of demographic behaviour and the relation between political decisions regarding this and the subsequent social response as point of departure - attempts to provide preliminary answers to these questions. It reveals a real autonomy of behaviour in the face of often fluctuating decisions and therefore offers a reflection on the nature of political constraints. The article makes explicit, through several examples, the particular place statistical administration occupies at the junction between politics and society. Thus it becomes possible to propose a number of hypotheses on an increasing estrangement between the political world and individuals.
Czech Sociological Review © 1996 Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic