You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Gender Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Promoting Gender Equality in Lithuania
Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review
Vol. 41, No. 6 (DECEMBER 2005), pp. 1041-1055
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41132242
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Gender equality, Womens rights, Nongovernmental organizations, Men, Feminism, Opportunity equality, Gender roles, Ombudsmen, Gender studies, Womens rights movements
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The article deals with the questions of gender policy formation and women's participation in Lithuanian political and civil life. It is based on the results of the EU 5th Framework project 'Enlargement, Gender and Governance: The Civic and Political Participation of Women in the EU Candidate Countries'. Drawing on qualitative data from interviews with women politicians and activists, the article mainly describes gender mainstreaming as implemented through 'transversal' action plans for gender equality. These action plans assign responsibility to different units for the delivery of different objectives. The author points out that 'transversalism' involves no necessary change in policy-making structures or practice, and argues that gender mainstreaming continues to be designated as a distinct or separate policy space in Lithuania. The author also notes that the absence of a stable commitment to gender mainstreaming and the general policy culture of Lithuania are not conducive the evaluation and impact assessment activities in this area.
Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review © 2005 Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic