Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks

José Rojas-Echenique and Stefano Allesina
Ecology
Vol. 92, No. 5 (May 2011), pp. 1174-1180
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41151245
Page Count: 7
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks
Preview not available

Abstract

Intransitive communities, those in which species' abilities cannot be ranked in a hierarchy, have been the focus of theoretical and empirical research, as intransitivity could help explain the maintenance of biodiversity. Here we show that models for intransitive competition embedding slightly different interaction rules can produce opposite patterns. In particular, we find that interactions in which an individual can be outcompeted by its neighbors, but cannot outcompete its neighbors, produce negative frequency dependence that, in turn, promotes coexistence. Whenever the interaction rule is modified toward symmetry (the individual and the neighbors can outcompete each other) the negative frequency dependence vanishes, producing different coexistence levels. Macroscopically, we find that asymmetric interactions yield highest biodiversity if species compete globally, while symmetric interactions favor highest biodiversity if competition takes place locally.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1174
    1174
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1175
    1175
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1176
    1176
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1177
    1177
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1178
    1178
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1179
    1179
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1180
    1180