Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Phylogenetic Signal in Nucleotide Data from Seed Plants: Implications for Resolving the Seed Plant Tree of Life

J. Gordon Burleigh and Sarah Mathews
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 91, No. 10 (Oct., 2004), pp. 1599-1613
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4123854
Page Count: 15
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($12.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phylogenetic Signal in Nucleotide Data from Seed Plants: Implications for Resolving the Seed Plant Tree of Life
Preview not available

Abstract

Effects of taxonomic sampling and conflicting signal on the inference of seed plant trees supported in previous molecular analyses were explored using 13 single-locus data sets. Changing the number of taxa in single-locus analyses had limited effects on log likelihood differences between the gnepine (Gnetales plus Pinaceae) and gnetifer (Gnetales plus conifers) trees. Distinguishing among these trees also was little affected by the use of different substitution parameters. The 13-locus combined data set was partitioned into nine classes based on substitution rates. Sites evolving at intermediate rates had the best likelihood and parsimony scores on gnepine trees, and those evolving at the fastest rates had the best parsimony scores on Gnetales-sister trees (Gnetales plus other seed plants). When the fastest evolving sites were excluded from parsimony analyses, well-supported gnepine trees were inferred from the combined data and from each genomic partition. When all sites were included, Gnetales-sister trees were inferred from the combined data, whereas a different tree was inferred from each genomic partition. Maximum likelihood trees from the combined data and from each genomic partition were well-supported gnepine trees. A preliminary stratigraphic test highlights the poor fit of Gnetales-sister trees to the fossil data.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1599
    1599
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1600
    1600
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1601
    1601
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1602
    1602
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1603
    1603
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1604
    1604
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1605
    1605
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1606
    1606
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1607
    1607
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1608
    1608
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1609
    1609
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1610
    1610
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1611
    1611
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1612
    1612
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1613
    1613