You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Percentile-based empirical distribution function estimates for performance evaluation of healthcare providers
Susan M. Paddock and Thomas A. Louis
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)
Vol. 60, No. 4 (AUGUST 2011), pp. 575-589
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41262293
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Statistical estimation, Health care industry, Modeling, Statism, Health care statistics, Simulations, Statistical models, Chronic kidney failure, Mortality, Musical intervals
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Hierarchical models are widely used to characterize the performance of individual healthcare providers. However, little attention has been devoted to systemwide performance evaluations, the goals of which include identifying extreme (e.g. the top 10%) provider performance and developing statistical benchmarks to define high quality care. Obtaining optimal estimates of these quantities requires estimating the empirical distribution function (EDF) of provider-specific parameters that generate the data set under consideration. However, the difficulty of obtaining uncertainty bounds for a squared error loss minimizing EDF estimate has hindered its use in systemwide performance evaluations. We therefore develop and study a percentile-based EDF estimate for univariate provider-specific parameters. We compute order statistics of samples drawn from the posterior distribution of provider-specific parameters to obtain relevant assessments of uncertainty of an EDF estimate and its features, such as thresholds and percentiles. We apply our method to data from the Medicare end stage renal disease programme, which is a health insurance programme for people with irreversible kidney failure. We highlight the risk of misclassifying providers as exceptionally good or poor performers when uncertainty in statistical benchmark estimates is ignored. Given the high stakes of performance evaluations, statistical benchmarks should be accompanied by precision estimates.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) © 2011 Royal Statistical Society