Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Estimating Site Occupancy and Detection Probability Parameters for Meso- and Large Mammals in a Coastal Ecosystem

Allan F. O'Connell Jr., Neil W. Talancy, Larissa L. Bailey, John R. Sauer, Robert Cook and Andrew T. Gilbert
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 70, No. 6 (Dec., 2006), pp. 1625-1633
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128094
Page Count: 9
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Estimating Site Occupancy and Detection Probability Parameters for Meso- and Large Mammals in a Coastal Ecosystem
Preview not available

Abstract

Large-scale, multispecies monitoring programs are widely used to assess changes in wildlife populations but they often assume constant detectability when documenting species occurrence. This assumption is rarely met in practice because animal populations vary across time and space. As a result, detectability of a species can be influenced by a number of physical, biological, or anthropogenic factors (e.g., weather, seasonality, topography, biological rhythms, sampling methods). To evaluate some of these influences, we estimated site occupancy rates using species-specific detection probabilities for meso- and large terrestrial mammal species on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. We used model selection to assess the influence of different sampling methods and major environmental factors on our ability to detect individual species. Remote cameras detected the most species (9), followed by cubby boxes (7) and hair traps (4) over a 13-month period. Estimated site occupancy rates were similar among sampling methods for most species when detection probabilities exceeded 0.15, but we question estimates obtained from methods with detection probabilities between 0.05 and 0.15, and we consider methods with lower probabilities unacceptable for occupancy estimation and inference. Estimated detection probabilities can be used to accommodate variation in sampling methods, which allows for comparison of monitoring programs using different protocols. Vegetation and seasonality produced species-specific differences in detectability and occupancy, but differences were not consistent within or among species, which suggests that our results should be considered in the context of local habitat features and life history traits for the target species. We believe that site occupancy is a useful state variable and suggest that monitoring programs for mammals using occupancy data consider detectability prior to making inferences about species distributions or population change.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1625
    1625
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1626
    1626
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1627
    1627
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1628
    1628
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1629
    1629
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1630
    1630
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1631
    1631
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1632
    1632
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1633
    1633