You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Ethical and Scientific Issues of Nanotechnology in the Workplace
Paul A. Schulte and Fabio Salamanca-Buentello
Environmental Health Perspectives
Vol. 115, No. 1 (Jan., 2007), pp. 5-12
Published by: The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4133058
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Nanotechnology, Disease risks, Nanoparticles, Workplaces, Occupational health and safety, Social ethics, Nanomaterials, Research ethics, Engineering ethics, Moral judgment
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In the absence of scientific clarity about the potential health effects of occupational exposure to nanoparticles, a need exists for guidance in decisionmaking about hazards, risks, and controls. An identification of the ethical issues involved may be useful to decision makers, particularly employers, workers, investors, and health authorities. Because the goal of occupational safety and health is the prevention of disease in workers, the situations that have ethical implications that most affect workers have been identified. These situations include the a) identification and communication of hazards and risks by scientists, authorities, and employers; b) workers' acceptance of risk; c) selection and implementation of controls; d) establishment of medical screening programs; and e) investment in toxicologic and control research. The ethical issues involve the unbiased determination of hazards and risks, nonmaleficence (doing no harm), autonomy, justice, privacy, and promoting respect for persons. As the ethical issues are identified and explored, options for decision makers can be developed. Additionally, societal deliberations about workplace risks of nanotechnologies may be enhanced by special emphasis on small businesses and adoption of a global perspective.
Environmental Health Perspectives © 2007 The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences