You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Barriers to Resolution in Ideologically Based Negotiations: The Role of Values and Institutions
Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni, Andrew J. Hoffman, Leigh L. Thompson, Don A. Moore, James J. Gillespie and Max H. Bazerman
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 27, No. 1 (Jan., 2002), pp. 41-57
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134368
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Fairness, Environmental management, Environmental regulation, Social psychology, Environmentalism, Emotion, Natural resources, Environmental pollution, Environmental conservation, Cognitive psychology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although traditional behavioral decision theory as applied to negotiation sheds light on some of the barriers encountered in negotiations, it does not fully account for many of the difficulties and failures to reach settlement in ideologically based disputes. In this article we identify a number of factors that differentiate ideologically based negotiations from other types of negotiations and advance a perspective that takes into account the value-laden and institutional contexts in which they occur. We illustrate our ideas by applying them to the organizationally relevant example of environmental disputes.
The Academy of Management Review © 2002 Academy of Management