Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

The Significance of 'It' in the Nomenclature of Three Tasmanian Conifers: Microcachrys Tetragona and Microstrobos Niphophilus (Podocarpaceae), and Diselma Archeri (Cupressaceae)

Richard K. Brummitt, Robert R. Mill and Aljos Farjon
Taxon
Vol. 53, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 529-539
DOI: 10.2307/4135634
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4135634
Page Count: 11
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($14.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Significance of 'It' in the Nomenclature of Three Tasmanian Conifers: Microcachrys Tetragona and Microstrobos Niphophilus (Podocarpaceae), and Diselma Archeri (Cupressaceae)
Preview not available

Abstract

The typification and tortuous nomenclature of three Tasmanian conifers is discussed. They are currently known as Microcachrys tetragona (Hook.) Hook. f., Microstrobos niphophilus J. Garden & L.A.S. Johnson (both Podocarpaceae) and Diselma archeri Hook. f. (Cupressaceae). The similarities between these plants, all of which are dioecious, microphyllous shrubs with minute cones and which often grow together, have resulted in their original descriptions being confused and each based on two or more elements belonging to different taxa. A chronological account of the chaotic and confusing literature relevant to this problem is presented together with a revised nomenclature. Much confusion in recent literature has been caused by authors misinterpreting what J.D. Hooker was referring to when he used the pronoun 'it' in a commentary in 1857. The most serious conclusion is that Pherosphaera hookeriana W. Archer bis is the correct name for ''Microstrobos niphophilus J. Garden & L.A.S. Johnson", a binary designation that has been in use for 50 years but which is shown still not to be a validly published name. As a consequence of this, the other (Australian) species of Microstrobos, M. fitzgeraldii (F. Muell.) J. Garden & L.A.S. Johnson, must also be transferred back to Pherosphaera. Lectotypes are designated for Microcachrys tetragona and Pherosphaera hookeriana;, an earlier lectotypification of the latter name is here rejected since the specimen chosen was not part of the original material. Possibilities of conserving names involved are discussed.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
529
    529
  • Thumbnail: Page 
530
    530
  • Thumbnail: Page 
531
    531
  • Thumbnail: Page 
532
    532
  • Thumbnail: Page 
533
    533
  • Thumbnail: Page 
534
    534
  • Thumbnail: Page 
535
    535
  • Thumbnail: Page 
536
    536
  • Thumbnail: Page 
537
    537
  • Thumbnail: Page 
538
    538
  • Thumbnail: Page 
539
    539